Monday, June 29, 2009
Rights Reversion when Title is OOP
http://www.sfwa.org/contracts/intropubcontracts5521.pdf
Sunday, June 28, 2009
Traditional Publishing Practices in the good old days before electronic rights considerations
In traditional publishing practices, the author submitted works to acquisitions editors at commercial or academic presses. If the work were accepted by the publisher, the publishing house would send a boilerplate contract to the author offering to publish the work. Commercial fiction publishing practices specified the transfer of all rights from the author to the publisher for a specified length of time, and the contract usually specified the amount of payment advanced against royalties, the percentage of cover price that would be paid in royalties for various editions, and the percentage of subsidiary rights (usually split 50/50 between publisher and author). If the novel sold to movies or television, the payment would be split 50/50. If the novel were sold to an audiobook publisher or paperback publisher, the split would be 50/50. But there was no mention of any royalties for electronic versions in those pre-digital days. How various publishers exploited electronic rights and paid no royalties at all for electronic publication is a horror story too terrible to relate here. Suffice it to say that authors got the short end of the stick.
Professional writers' organizations like Science Fiction Writers of America (SFWA), Western Writers of America (WWA), Mystery Writers of America (MWA), Romance Writers of America (RWA), Horror Writers Association (HWA), American Society of Journalists and Authors (ASJA), and the Authors Guild cried fowl and collectively sued some publishers. They also, individually and collectively, developed model contracts for electronic rights and urged members to line through and change boilerplate contracts to include specific wordings that protected authors' rights and assured adequate compensation. They also established the Authors Registry, a kind of Copyright Clearing House, to make it easy for anyone to legally photocopy copyrighted works for a small fee (see http://www.authorsregistry.org/).
These writers organizations have been negotiating with Google about the digitization project settlement (http://www.authorsguild.org/advocacy/articles/settlement-resources.html).
References and Links
http://www.authorsguild.org/advocacy/articles/settlement-resources.html
http://www.authorsregistry.org/
http://www.westernwriters.org/about_wwa.htm
http://www.horror.org/aboutus.htm
Friday, June 26, 2009
SFWA Statement on Electronic Rights
http://www.sfwa.org/contracts/elec.htm
Monday, June 22, 2009
Is the Traditional Publishing Model Dying?
http://www.forbes.com/2008/12/12/book-publishing-authors-oped-cx_lo_1212osborne.html
http://www.forbes.com/2009/06/04/books-publishing-social-media-opinions-columnists-kindle-twitter.html?partner=relatedstoriesbox
Traditional publishing is changing. But is it dead or dying? To paraphrase Mark Twain: rumors of its death may be greatly exagerated!
Sunday, June 21, 2009
Saturday, June 20, 2009
The Fiction Industry
Thursday, June 18, 2009
Duke University Library Collections on mobile phones
http://tinyurl.com/n9nue7
Thursday, June 11, 2009
Two LJ Articles worth reading
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6662895.html
ARL opposes confidentiality agreements with vendors
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6664369.html?nid=2673&source=link&rid=1690330361
Why poor, starving writers need royalties for digital works
Writers like Stephen King, Dean Koontz, and other best-selling authors have escaped from the 9 to 5 trap (both were school teachers before their writing sold to the movies), but they still have to write constantly (and well, each novel expected to be better than the last) in order to pay their bills (including their agents, publicists, etc., as well as rent and insurance and ISP fees). Not only must they write, they must also sell their writing.